Patent Litigation Doesn't Have to be Prohibitively Expensive
Stephen D. Rosenberg's article discussing ways to manage patent litigation expenses was published in the November 30, 2007 edition of New England In-House, a quarterly publication of Lawyers Weekly, Inc. Click the link below to read the article.
The Boston ERISA and Insurance Litigation Blog
Stephen D. Rosenberg authors and maintains the Boston ERISA and Insurance Litigation Blog, which reviews significant case law developments in Massachusetts courts and the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Click the link below to review the blog.
Home Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Home Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 444 Mass. 599, 830 N.E.2d 186 (July 7, 2005) is an important case argued by Marc L. LaCasse that clarifies the scope of coverage under an employers' liability policy for claims made by leased employees who sue the client company for injuries sustained in the course of work. You can read the court's opinion by clicking the link below.
Insurance Coverage: What Every Business Lawyer Should Know
By clicking below, you can review the seminar materials from "What Every Business Lawyer Should Know About Insurance Coverage," presented in part by Stephen D. Rosenberg. Detailed are the nuts and bolts of liability insurance coverage, principles and considerations regarding professional services coverage, directors and officers liability insurance, control of the insurance relationship, the consequences of an insurer's denial of coverage, Chapter 93A liability, and broker liability.
Great Northern Ins. Co. v. Paino Associates
In Great Northern Ins. Co. v. Paino Assocs., 369 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D. Mass. 2005) the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts analyzed the coverage implications of a contractor's contractual indemnity and insurance agreements. Joseph H. Aronson and Erica L. Silverman persuaded the court to grant summary judgment in favor of their client, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority. Read the court's opinion by clicking below.
Harold F. Downey, Jr. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co./U.S. Healthcare
In Downey v. Aetna, an ERISA case argued by Stephen D. Rosenberg and decided by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the court analyzed whether a plan administrator that was also the disability insurer had a conflict of interest when it was called upon to review a claim for disability benefits, and whether a decision to deny a claim for disability benefits was arbitrary or capricious. Click the link below to read the court's memorandum.
