Decisions

Home Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Home Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 444 Mass. 599, 830 N.E.2d 186 (2005) is an important case argued by Marc L. LaCasse that clarifies the scope of coverage under an employers' liability policy for claims made by leased employees who sue the client company for injuries sustained in the course of work.

Great Northern Ins. Co. v. Paino Associates

In Great Northern Ins. Co. v. Paino Assocs., 369 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D. Mass. 2005) the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts analyzed the coverage implications of a contractor's contractual indemnity and insurance agreements. Joseph H. Aronson persuaded the court to grant summary judgment in favor of his client, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority.

Harold F. Downey, Jr. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. /U.S. Healthcare

In Downey v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 02-10103 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8150 (D. Mass. 2003), an ERISA case argued by Stephen D. Rosenberg and decided by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the court analyzed whether a plan administrator that was also the disability insurer had a conflict of interest when it was called upon to review a claim for disability benefits, and whether a decision to deny a claim for disability benefits was arbitrary or capricious.

Serving institutional and individual clients since 1981

Call The McCormack Firm, LLC at 617-951-2929 or contact us online today.